possibility of UD1 parent-member consolidation by time
Dears, I need move one base member under another parent in UD1 dimensions, the problem is that member should be consolidated till specific time period and then should be consolidated under another parent. There is no option like "percent consolidation" with time frame on UD1 dimensions. Could anyone have any solution for described problem? Before: U1#A(parent) U1#A001(base) consolidated till proper month in 2026 U1#A002(base) After: U1#B(parent) U1#A001(base) consolidated after proper month in 2026 U1#B001(base)Same Scenario Across Two Cubes vs Separate Scenarios — Pros & Cons?
Hello everyone, I’m looking for feedback on the pros and cons of using a single Actual scenario across two cubes (e.g., Consolidation and FP&A) versus defining separate scenarios for each cube. For example: Option 1 (shared): Consolidation Cube : Actual (Scenario Type = Actual) FP&A Cube : Actual (Scenario Type = Actual) Option 2 (separate): Consolidation Cube : Actual (Scenario Type = Actual) FP&A Cube : Monthly (Scenario Type = Control) From your experience, how do these approaches compare in terms of data governance, maintenance, performance, flexibility for planning/reporting, and potential risks (e.g., unintended impacts between cubes)? Any best practices or lessons learned would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
TXM - TXM - Reconciling Duplicate Lines with the Same Amount in the Same Data Set
Hi, We are working on a Proof of Concept (POC) with the aim of implementation. However, one issue remains a roadblock and is hindering the adoption of the solution: the deletion of lines loaded with the same amounts, which we are unable to reconcile or isolate. In TXM, our ERP system sends us many identical lines (following corrections by the accountants): e.g., Transaction ID 1, CPT1, Invoice: 10000 Amount: 10; Transaction ID 2, CPT1, Invoice: 10000 Amount: 10; Transaction ID 3, CPT1, Invoice: 10000 Amount: 10. I would like to know how, within a single Data Set and from the same Data Source, to reconcile and/or isolate these lines, which represent unnecessary noise in the analyses. From my understanding, intra-Data Set reconciliations are not possible in this case. I sometimes have 2, 3, 4, 5 or even more almost identical lines that unnecessarily clutter the analyses and hinder the actual cases that need to be studied. Do you have a solution for reconciling these lines and placing them in a reconciliation status awaiting validation? (Ideally, matching them with a reason code like "same lines," for example.) Thanks! BR
Hide Tabs in Dashboard
Hi, I have a dashboard with 5 tabs which is assigned to a workflow step. One of the tab has a cube view where assumptions are inputted. I want this tab to be visible only for administrators and not for every user. IsVisible is something i have used to hide dashboard components with an XFBR but i dont see the same option for embedded dashboard. Is there a way to get this done?
